Research Questions

  • What is the role of descriptive schemas and instruments in records creation, control, maintenance, appraisal, preservation and use in traditional recordkeeping systems in the three focus areas?


  • What is the role of descriptive schemas and instruments in records creation, control, maintenance, appraisal, preservation, and use in emerging recordkeeping systems in digital and web-based environments in the three focus areas? Do new tools need to be developed, and if so, what should they be? If not, should present instruments be broadened, enriched, adapted?


  • What is the role of descriptive schemas and instruments in addressing reliability, accuracy and authenticity requirements (including the InterPARES 1 Benchmark and Baseline Authenticity Requirements) concerning the records investigated by InterPARES 2?


  • What is the role of descriptive schemas and instruments in archival processes concerned with the long-term preservation of the records in question?


  • Do current interoperable frameworks support the interoperability of descriptive schema and instruments across the three focus areas? If not, what kinds of frameworks are needed?


  • What are the implications of the answers to the above questions for traditional archival descriptive standards, systems and strategies? Will they need to be modified to enable archival programs to meet new requirements, or will new ones need to be developed? If so, what should they be?


  • To what extent do existing descriptive schemas and instruments used in the sectors concerned with the focus areas addressed by this project (for example, the geo-spatial data community) support and inform requirements such as those developed by InterPARES 1? Will they need to be modified to enable these sectors to meet these requirements, or will new ones need to be developed? If so, what should they be?


  • What is the relationship between the role of descriptive schemas and instruments needed by the creator and those required by the preserver to support the archival processes of appraisal, preservation and dissemination? What tools are needed to support the export/import/exchange of descriptive data between systems?


  • What is the role of descriptive schemas and instruments in rights management and in identifying and tracking records components, versions, expressions, performances and other manifestations, and derivative works?


  • Is it important to be able to relate the record of artistic and scientific activity to the associated expression, performance, product, work or other manifestation of it and, if so, in what ways can descriptive activities facilitate it?


Methodologies

The Description Cross-domain proposes to apply several methods in the conduct of the following specific research activities: literary warrant analysis, metadata mapping, conceptual modeling, activity modeling, metamodeling and empirical instantiation. The research design is essentially sequential: it provides for activities that will be ongoing throughout InterPARES 2, activities to be conducted by the Description Cross-domain that are independent of the timelines of any other InterPARES 2 task force, activities that can only take place as data are received from other task forces, and project completion activities.

Expected Outcomes

The expected outcomes of this research are scholarly comparative discussions of existing descriptive standards, and an intellectual framework of descriptive standards for the records under examination. It is possible that actual standards will begin to be drafted, but this is not an objective of the research at this time.

To see the Description Cross-domain’s Research Design Statement, please click here.

Documents

Public documents for the Description Cross-domain are located here

Search for Documents  •  Contact Us  •  Sitemap  •  Copyright